Shot on color negative. Wedding Photojournalism, Kuala Lumpur.
The beginning of “A Photo A Day” in this site started because of “No Idea How To Compile My Zillion of Works Done Through The Years” and the practical laziness of selecting more than 30 shots a day for an album. I’d rather spend more time shooting than anything else. That’s the imbalance in me.
Since the start of “A Photo A Day” in both of my blogs (blogspot as well), I have learned that posting a photo a day makes me think hard about that one particular shot over a 24 hour window. I begin to scrutinize it’s flaws and study how to do better. It makes me concentrate better on segregating my street photography and other works from my commercial works. The discipline of blogging daily in this style is keeping me sharp. It helps me avoid sloppiness. It helps in reinforcing my focus on doing what I love.
shot with Nikon FM3A, 85mm F1.8 lens.
Shot with Leica M6 and 15 Heliar
shot with Diana F+ toy camera
Olympus OM-1, Zuiko 135mm F2.8, NPH400
Leica M6, 15 Heliar, NPH400.
I am not a big fan of digital HDR (high dynamic range) shots. Few HDR shots I’ve seen impressed me. That does not mean I will not attempt a HDR shot in future, but I prefer to keep things as it is.
As for the above shot, I saw a silhouette, it’s a silhouette, it’s never HDR to my eyes. I find most digital HDR artificial-looking. It’s my personal preference, period.
HDR has become so easily achievable digitally today (even the latest Olympus E-5 has an Art Filter for it). But if we start depending more and more on what “surprises” latest software is gonna give us, we naturally become less and less of a photographer.
We will grow so dependent on what software can give us that we will attempt to shoot anything, in any angle, under any lighting condition, with any composition cause the software will make it look “good” ultimately. You will be amazed at how an ordinary-looking snapshot in the mid day sun with totally flat details will stand out after a HDR processing for example.
After we have batch-processed the hundreds to thousands of shots with software, we just have to select the few “best” to feature as our portfolio. Not much thought needed during shooting, isn’t it?
At post-processing stage, if a certain effect doesn’t look good, we can try another effect. With such high megapixels from affordable full frame cameras today, we can also crop till it works during post-processing. We no longer need to nail the composition right at the point of shooting.
“… for nothing is impossible with 21MP 5Dmk2…” the book of Canon 1:37
The invention of AF (autofocus) has already made many photographers slaves to it. Many photographers swear by fast and accurate AF and can’t live without it. We easily will dump a 45 point AF system for a 51 point AF system without much consideration. Our priority in choosing cameras become centered on AF system more than actual image quality.
Now is year 2010. Will our works be taken over by software and modern digital cameras by year 2020? Will the “photographer’s eye” still be as highly regarded in another 10 years’ time? Will “the decisive moment” still be sought after when digital cameras do more than 100 frames per sec?
I don’t know.
But I choose to follow my heart to do what I love and continue to hone my photographic skills and vision. It’s the “decisive moment” that gives me the kick in photography, not rescuing photos at post-processing.
Still thinking of how to compile my portfolio, it’s all over the place, badly needs organizing. Here’s a photo for the day. If I don’t start the ball rolling, nothing will ever get done. That’s life.
Holga, medium format film.